<![CDATA[UN4LA - UN4LA NEWS]]>Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:00:58 -0700Weebly<![CDATA[UN4LA NEWS, OCTOBER 2020]]>Sun, 04 Oct 2020 16:52:30 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/un4la-news-october-2020

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.
UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.
Contact UN4LA

According to the State's latest Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), California cities need to build more than 2,000,000 units of housing by 2030.  But a recently released report by the Embarcadero Institute says that the way the State calculated the RHNA allocations was seriously flawed.  SB 828, a bill authored by State Senator Scott Wiener which the Legislature approved in 2018, led to the use of an incorrect vacancy rate and caused double counting.  The flawed methodology caused the State to overestimate the need for housing in Southern California, the Bay Area and Sacramento by more than 900,000.
According to the Embarcadero report, it also resulted in an analysis that failed to identify the real need: affordable housing.  Read the full report below.
Double Counting in the Latest Housing Needs Assessment from the Embarcadero Institute

The Draft EIR for the Downtown Community Plan Update has been released.  If you don’t live in Downtown, you may be asking yourself, “Why should I care?” 
You should care because the Department of City Planning has linked the Downtown Plan to the rollout of the City’s new zoning code.  The new code is a radical departure from the previous approach, emphasizing form over use.  This Form Based Code will have huge implications on development in Los Angeles, most likely allowing larger projects to be built “by-right”, with no need for public hearings or environmental review.  If the new code is adopted for the Downtown Community Plan, the City has said it intends to use the code to implement all of LA’s community plans.
If you’d like to comment on the Draft EIR, please follow the City’s instructions to make sure your comments are considered.  These are the instructions posted on the City Planning web site:
If you wish to submit comments on the Draft EIR, please submit your written comments (including a name, telephone number, and contact information and the following file number ENV-2017-433-EIR) during the Comment Period, via mail or e-mail to the following addresses:
                 Mail:  Brittany Arceneaux, City Planner
                           City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning
                           200 North Spring Street, Room 667
                           Los Angeles, CA 90012
             E-mail:  brittany.arceneaux@lacity.org

Please also note the following from the City Planning web site:
Comments that are sent to the City before or after the Comment Period provided above or that fail to comply with the above instructions for the manner or submission of comments may not be included in the Final EIR and receive a response to comments under CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.
If you submit comments via e-mail, be sure to include the following in the subject line:
Case No.: ENV-2017-433-EIR
The deadline to submit comments is December 4, 2020 at 5:00 pm.

Downtown Community Plan Update Draft Documents
LADCP has released the Hollywood Community Plan Implementation Overlay, which outlines the zoning that will be used to implement the Hollywood Community Plan Update (HCPU).  If you visit the LADCP’s web page for the HCPU, the first thing you see is a gallery of colorful images overlaid with phrases that supposedly outline what the Plan will deliver: Lowers Building Heights, Creates Open Space, Supports Accessible Transit, and Promotes Livable, Complete Streets.  Will the HCPU actually deliver on all these promises?  Let’s break it down….
Lowers Building Heights: The plan only does this in small, specific historic areas.  Actually, in most of the Hollywood area the Plan allows developers to create much larger buildings than are currently allowed by offering generous density bonusses. 
Creates Open Space: The Plan proposes to do this mostly by supporting the creation of the Hollywood Central Park, a 44-acre “cap park” which would be built over the Hollywood Freeway.  While Hollywood could certainly use more park space, some estimates put the price tag at around $1 billion, and at this point funding is far from certain.  Also, it’s important to ask why the City proposes the construction of a new 44-acre park when the Department of Recreation and Parks doesn’t even have the funds to maintain existing parks.
Supports Accessible Transit: Even if this were true (and the City’s record on planning related to transit is dismal), through its radical upzoning framework the Plan will probably drive the remaining low-income households that rely on transit out of the area.
Promotes Livable, Complete Streets: This is good news, because through upzoning the Plan promises to accelerate gentrification and push more Hollywood residents out of their homes and onto the streets.  Let’s hope they are livable.
Draft Hollywood Community Plan Implementation (CPIO) District

Hollywood Community Plan Update Interactive Maps
Public comments on the updated CPIO and Draft Community Plan can be sent to Sophia Kim at:
At a long, contentious on-line meeting on August 26, LA City Planning officials heard comments from scores of citizens who had sharply different views of the proposed Hollywood Center Project.  The project would create a large, mixed-use campus straddling Vine Street north of Hollywood Blvd..  Proponents argued that the Project would offer needed housing, create jobs, boost transit ridership and invite new investment.  Opponents claimed that the Project would have numerous negative impacts on surrounding neighborhoods and questioned the wisdom of building twin skyscrapers on parcels that are crossed by the Hollywood Fault. 
Another hearing is scheduled for October 15, where six appellants (including the project applicant) will weigh in on the actions taken by the City related to the Hollywood Center. 
Hollywood Center Hearing, October 15, 2020

You may have heard that demolition of the structures on the LACMA campus has already begun.  According to Director Michael Govan and architect Peter Zumthor, the new building to be constructed will free the museum from historical constraints and allow visitors to experience art in a new way.  How do they plan to do this?  By radically reducing the amount of exhibition space and consigning much of LACMA’s collection to storage.  Govan also decided there was no room for curators or administrative staff in the new building, so they’ll be moved to a high-rise across the street at cost of $5 million a year. 
While Govan and Zumthor claim that they’re allowing the public to interact with art in an exciting new way, there are numerous critics who believe the new design is a disastrous mistake which will cripple the museum.  Joseph Giovannini is one of them.
The Demolition of LACMA: Art Sacrificed to Architecture


<![CDATA[UN4LA NEWS, AUGUST 2020]]>Sun, 02 Aug 2020 16:39:36 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/un4la-news-august-2020

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.

UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.

Contact UN4LA


Los Angeles County is starting the process of updating the LA River Master Plan, and has issued a Notice of Preparation as the first step in preparing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).  As part of the process, the County invited members of the public to attend an on-line scoping meeting on July 29 so that interested parties could offer input on the scope and content of the EIR.

Even if you missed the scoping meeting, you can still take part in the process.  Comments on the NOP are due by August 6, 2020.  You can send your comments to:


The County will notify the public when the Draft EIR is ready for review and comment.

For more information on the LA River Master Plan, go to:

LA River Master Plan

LA River Master Plan: Program Environmental Impact Report


In July the Inglewood City Council approved a controversial arena/sports complex that would serve as the new home of the LA Clippers.  The project has faced opposition from community members, and was also the subject of a lawsuit brought by Madison Square Garden Co., owner of the Forum.  The lawsuit went away earlier this year when Clippers owner Steve Ballmer bought the Forum for $400 million.

Ballmer plans to begin construction of the project in 2021, with the hope that it will be completed by 2024, when the Clippers' lease at Staples Center expires. 

Environmental Report for Clippers Arena Approved by Inglewood City Council


In spite of concerns expressed by communities over health and safety issues, on June 25 the City Planning Commission approved the proposed Restaurant Beverage Program.  The ordinance would allow restaurants to receive liquor permits "over the counter", in other words, without any hearings to invite public input.  A number of neighborhoods councils and community groups submitted letters opposing the plan, fearing that it will exacerbate crime and put more drunk drivers on the road.  The City claims that the plan contains sufficient safeguards to protect LA's communities.

The ordinance now goes to the Comprehensive Job Creation Plan Committee and the Planning & Land Use Management Committee.  You can read the recommendation report below.

Restaurant Beverage Program Recommendation Report


On July 21 the LA County Board of Supervisors took the first step toward putting a measure on the November ballot that, if approved by voters, would earmark 10% of the County’s unrestricted general funds for social service and racial justice programs.  The County will now prepare a draft of the measure's language, which would have to be approved in subsequent votes by the Supervisors.  

Proponents of the measure argue that a greater share of public funds must be set aside for job training, affordable housing and mental health services.  Critics assert that the ballot measure could take away needed flexibility in the preparation of the County's budget.  LAist offers more details.

LA County Takes Step Towards Asking Voters To Divert More Money To Social Services


As a result of the pandemic, tens of thousands of renters across LA County are now unemployed.  While there are currently emergency orders in place to halt evictions, eventually those orders will expire, and a large number of renters will be facing homelessness.  

A report issued in May predicts that LA will soon see a tidal wave of evictions caused by the pandemic.  Author Gary Blasi, Professor Emeritus of Law, offers two estimates.  The first is that members of 36,000 households could become homeless.  That's the best case scenario.  If sufficient support networks aren't in place to serve those facing eviction, the number could rise to 120,000. 

To learn more about Blasi's predictions, including what steps public officials could take to ease the crisis, click on the link below.

New Study Warns of Looming Eviction Crisis in Los Angeles County

<![CDATA[un4la news, july 2020]]>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:41:17 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/un4la-news-july-2020

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.

UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.

Contact UN4LA


On June 23 LA City Councilmember Jose Huizar, who represents CD 14, was arrested by the Department of Justice (DOJ).  He's charged with participating in a long-standing and widespread conspiracy that involved shaking down developers in return for project approvals.  Huizar's arrest follows four guilty pleas from four individuals who have already admitted wrongdoing, including a former Councilmember, a former member of the City Planning Commission, a former CD 14 staff member, and a development consultant.  The news comes as no surprise to many Angelenos.  For years many citizens who follow the planning process have voiced concerns that the system was rigged.  The LA Times offers details on Huizar's arrest.

L.A. City Councilman Jose Huizar Charged in Federal Corruption Probe

One of the most infuriating aspects of this situation is that court documents show that in at least one case a developer was able to reduce the amount of affordable housing required in their project by donating tens of thousands of dollars to political committees tied to Huizar. 

Tower Project Shows Toll of Bribery in Huizar Case: Less Affordable Housing

Even though it should be clear by now that corruption is rampant at LA City Hall, for the most part the City Council's response has been limited to belated expressions of outrage.  But David Ryu and Paul Koretz have put forward two motions aimed at taking on corruption.  UN4LA believes their proposal for an independent office to investigate wrongdoing is a good start.

It's Time to Take a Stand against Corruption at L.A. City Hall


The City of LA isn't the only place where elected officials are suspected of violating the law.  A storm has been brewing in Inglewood over Treasurer Wanda Brown's accusations of wrongdoing by the City's leadership.  Mayor James Butts' refusal to allow Brown to speak at a City Council meeting does not seem like a good sign.  Is the Mayor trying to hide something? 

Inglewood Mayor Refuses to Allow Treasurer to Give Remarks at City Council Meeting


California voters will get a chance to weigh in on rent control in the November elections, but in the meantime, some cities in LA County are considering passing their own local ordinances.  On June 25, the City Council of Culver City considered their options regarding rent control.  Apparently the meeting was long and contentious.

Culver City Council Explores Options for Rent Control

<![CDATA[UN4LA NEWS, JUNE 2020]]>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 04:05:05 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/un4la-news-june-2020

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.

UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.

Contact UN4LA


The last week has been an extraordinary one for Los Angeles and for the country.  Massive protests have caught the attention of elected officials and other leaders, forcing a conversation not just about policing, but also about budget priorities, housing, and government accountability.

The protests have moved these issues to the forefront, but the problems have been with us for years.  The LA area has been struggling for nearly a decade to reduce rampant homelessness without much success.  In a number of cities throughout LA County the budget process is opaque and important decisions are made behind closed doors with little or no public input.  And the string of guilty pleas that have emerged as a result of an ongoing DOJ investigation in the City of LA have confirmed the view, held by many Angelenos, that the development process is rife with corruption.

There are no easy answers to any of these problems, but a good way to get started on solving them is to demand complete transparency and real accountability in government.  UN4LA believes that government exists to serve the people.  UN4LA also believes that our elected officials have largely grown complacent, more interested in maintaining the status quo than in responding to the needs of citizens.

Taking to the streets to demand change is a great way to start, but it's only the first step in the long, difficult process of actually making change happen.  The next steps involve engaging with city officials, speaking up at city council meetings, and using the ballot box to hold elected representatives accountable.  We look forward to working with all of LA's communities to create a more open, more responsive government. 


The recent headlines regarding the ongoing investigation of wrongdoing at LA City Hall have made it clear that change is needed.  In May Councilmember David Ryu presented two motions aimed at tackling corruption.  The first would create an office to investigate corruption at City Hall, and the second would take away the power Councilmembers currently have to alter land use decisions.  Ryu has been an outspoken voice for transparency, and has previously presented other motions targeting pay-to-play politics, but his earlier efforts were either watered down or shot down.  It will be interesting to see if, with the DOJ corruption investigation still going, Ryu will face the same opposition this time around.

Below are links to the press release issued by Ryu, and also to the motions themselves.

Ryu Press Release

Council File 20-0608
Office of Anti-Corruption and Transparency / Independent Auditors and Investigators

Council File 20-0609
Los Angeles City Charter Section 245 Subsection (e) / Limiting Unilateral Influence in Development Decisions


And to underline the need for the City of LA to tackle systemic corruption, we've had two more guilty pleas as a result of the Department of Justice's investigation into pay-to-play practices at City Hall.  Please note that these individuals have acknowledged that they did not act alone, but were part in an ongoing criminal conspiracy involving at least one LA City Councilmember, as well as other City Hall staffers.  This is not just a matter of rooting out a few random crooks.  It is now clearer than ever that the project approval process in the City of Los Angeles is rigged to favor the interests of real estate investors.  It's almost certain that we'll see further charges filed against City of LA elected officials and/or their staff members.

Consultant Agrees to Plead Guilty to RICO Offense Related to Bribery Scheme that Enriched L.A. City Councilmember and Associates

Former Aide to L.A. City Councilmember Agrees to Plead Guilty to RICO Charge Stemming from ‘Pay-to-Play’ Corruption Scheme


At the end of May, the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (CPC) gave their unanimous approval to a modified version of the Promenade 2035 Plan.  The lengthy session involved hearing appeals from four individuals/groups based in the community, as well as an additional appeal from the developer.  The appellants from within the community had numerous concerns about project impacts, including traffic, noise, and the lack of affordable housing.  

One of the most serious concerns was the inclusion of the 15,000-seat stadium proposed by the developer.  With respect to this component, the CPC approved two possible options: a 10,000-seat stadium with an enclosed roof, or a 7,500-seat stadium with a with a partially open roof.  The developer also agreed to modify the original plan, in which all housing was to be market rate, to include 15% affordable and workforce housing.


As the City of Inglewood has seen an unprecedented wave of new development, it has also seen the displacement of many long-time residents as rents rise, forcing out low-income tenants.  In May the Inglewood City Council voted to allocate $1.2 million to create a Housing Protection Department.  The creation of this new department will involve the hiring of up to 17 new staff members, but implementation could be delayed due to loss of revenue as a result of the pandemic.

City of Inglewood Creates Housing Protection Department

<![CDATA[UN4LA NEWS, MAY 2020]]>Sat, 02 May 2020 23:43:51 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/un4la-news-may-2020

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.

UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.

Contact UN4LA


As the City of LA's budget numbers go deep in the red, the City Council apparently wants to keep the public completely in the dark.  Budget & FInance Committee Chair Paul Krekorian has authored a motion asking that the City forego the usual process of holding hearings with City Departments to write the budget, and instead approve a streamlined process where the Committee would receive input from a few senior advisors.  Krekorian claims cancelling the hearings is necessary because of the pandemic, but it's hard not to suspect that his real motive is to avoid public oversight completely.  While in-person hearings may be out of the question, there are a number of alternatives that would allow department heads to offer input and allow the public to have a voice in the process.  Last year the City kept the public in the dark during the budget process and we ended up hundreds of millions of dollars in the red.  It's crucial that City Departments and the public have a say in the writing the budget.  Jack Humphreville explains why in this article from CityWatch.

Creating City Budget Behind Closed Doors


You may have already heard about the City's proposed Restaurant Beverage Program, a plan to grant over-the-counter liquor permits to restaurants with no public hearings.  The Department of City Planning (DCP) has been working on this for years, and recently published what they claim is a stronger version of the ordinance.  The DCP said in April that they plan to bring to the City Planning Commission in the coming months.

While some Neighborhood Councils support the Program, others are strongly opposed, largely because it prevents the community from having a voice on applications for liquor permits.  The Program is also opposed by Alcohol Justice, the LA Drug & Alcohol Policy Alliance, and the Community Coalition.  Here's the latest draft of the ordinance.

Restaurant Beverage Program Ordinance

What you may not have heard is that in March Councilmember Bob Blumenfield submitted a motion, supposedly intended to help restaurants cope with the pandemic, which would not only enact the ordinance immediately but make it retroactive.  If approved, the motion would direct the City to.... 

Implement the Restaurant Beverage Program as instructed by Council on August 14, 2018, to be
made retroactive to include any pending applications for conditional use permits where the
applicant accepts the standard conditions of Restaurant Beverage Program.

This link will take you to the complete motion.

Blumenfield Motion

While everybody wants to help neighborhood restaurants survive the shutdown imposed by the pandemic, this program will have far-reaching and long-lasting consequences for our communities.  City Planning has already been dumping alcohol on our communities by approving Master CUPs that grant 20 liquor permits (Crossroads, Hollywood) and 30 liquor permits (Metropolis, Downtown) at a time.  This reckless abuse of the permitting process shows a complete disregard for the health and safety of Angelenos.  The Restaurant Beverage Program is just another examples of the City's flagrant disregard for the well-being of our communities.


In yet another sign that the fix is in regarding the controversial Hollywood Center Project, the Department of City Planning (DCP) has released a letter saying that it will not grant an extension on the comment period for the Environmental Impact Report (EIR).  The project is a massive one, consisting of residential and commercial uses and encompassing over 1.2 million square feet.  It includes two 11-story buildings and two skyscrapers, one rising 35 stories and another rising 46 stories.  The fact that the City of LA chose to release the EIR during a global pandemic made it clear that City Hall hopes to limit public participation to speed approval of this toxic project.  Now, in spite of communications from numerous individuals and community groups asking that the comment period be extended, the City has said it's sticking to its original June 1 deadline.  

In the letter rejecting the request for an extension, the DCP argues that the EIR is readily available on-line 
and that interested parties can obtain a copy on CD-ROM or flash drive.  Apparently City Planning doesn't realize that the coronavirus has caused severe disruptions in the lives of thousands of Angelenos, and that they may have other matters that they need to focus on right now.  Unemployed workers have no money for food or bills.  Businesses owners are trying to figure out how to keep from going under.  Parents are struggling to be both teachers and entertainers for their school-age children.  And adult children are trying to ensure the health of their aging parents with existing health problems.  But the DCP apparently believes that none of this will deter anyone from submitting comments on the Hollywood Center Project by the current deadline.

If you would like to contact the DCP to express your opinion regarding this matter, you can send an e-mail to:

Mindy Nguyen, Department of City Planning
Email:    mindy.nguyen@lacity.org

Please include the following text in your subject line:

Hollywood Center EIR Extension, Case No. ENV-2018-2116-EIR


Enlightenment Plaza, a permanent supportive housing project slated for Rampart Village, could break ground as early as this summer.  The project would be comprised of 454 units in five eight-story buildings within walking distance of the Metro station at Vermont/Beverly.  Funding would be provided in part by Measure HHH, a bond approved by voters to create housing for the homeless.  More details in this story from The Real Deal. 

Affordable Developer’s First Project Will Be a Big One in Rampart Village


You've read about real estate appraiser and former City Planning Commissioner Justin Kim's efforts to deliver a bribe to a member of the LA City Council.  But you may not have heard that Kim also gave generously to finance the campaigns of a number of current Councilmembers.  The LA Times has done some digging, and they report on what they found in this article.

LA's Politicians Took His Campaign Donations.  Then He Admitted Arranging a Bribe.

<![CDATA[UN4LA NEWS, APRIL 2020]]>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 03:26:55 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/un4la-news-april-2020

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.

UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.

Contact UN4LA


As the pandemic deepens across the globe, and cities across the US are taking measures to halt the spread of the coronavirus, Angelenos are dealing with a new reality.

In the City of LA, Mayor Garcetti has ordered the closure of all non-essential businesses, but this raises the question of what is essential.  In this article, Curbed asks if construction work is essential, and looks at responses from developers, unions, and government agencies across the country.

How Essential Is Construction During the Coronavirus Pandemic?

As LA businesses close down, workers have been laid off or let go, putting thousands of renters in a tight spot.  The LA Times reports on actions taken by Mayor Garcetti to temporarily stop evictions and freeze rents. 

Tenants Get Help as LA Freezes Rent Hikes for Thousands of Apartments over Coronavirus

Legacy businesses are those restaurants, shops and service providers that have a long-standing presence in our communities.  The LA Conservancy has suggestions for ways you can support your favorite local business during this difficult time.

Support Legacy Businesses


While the pandemic has been dominating the headlines, there have been important new developments in the Department of Justice's investigation into corruption in the City of LA.

Earlier this month former LA City Councilmember Mitch Englander was charged with obstructing an investigation into illegal activities.  Late last week he agreed to plead guilty to one count of falsifying facts. 

Ex-Los Angeles City Councilman Agrees to Plead Guilty to Federal Charge

Also this month, real estate appraiser Justin Kim agreed to plead guilty to delivering hundreds of thousands of dollars to an LA City Councilmember in exchange for help with moving a project forward.

Fundraiser to Plead Guilty to Delivering Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars to Bribe Member of Los Angeles City Council


No doubt many Angelenos are tired of being cooped up in their homes.  Even if it isn't safe to go roaming around the city right now, you can still take of virtual tour of LA County.  The LA Conservancy will show you some of LA's most famous landmarks, along with many others you've never even heard of.    

Explore Los Angeles County

<![CDATA[UN4LA NEWS, MARCH 2020]]>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 17:37:59 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/un4la-news-march-2020

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.

UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.

Contact UN4LA

Councilmember Gil Cedillo has proposed a radical way to keep rental costs down: Invoke eminent domain.  Cedillo's proposal is intended to help the low-income households of Chinatown's Hillside Villa Apartments, now that their affordability covenants have expired and they're faced with massive rent increases.  Predictably, the plan has been embraced by tenant advocacy groups and condemned by property owners.  This story from the Downtown News offers more details. 
Cedillo Proposes Acquiring Chinatown's Hillside Villa

In response to requests from a number of groups, the City of LA has extended the period for public comment on the Sidewalk Repair Program Draft Environmental Impact Report (SRP DEIR) to April 24, 2020.  The SRP is expected to remove more than 12,000 street trees over 30 years.  While the City claims that the Program's negative impacts can be mitigated to a level where they're not significant, a number of tree advocates disagree. If you'd like to offer your comments on DEIR, click on the link below.
Sidewalk Repair Program Draft Environmental Impact Report

The controversial Oak Savanna project has been the subject of a bitter struggle for more than a decade.  Harridge Development proposes the construction of 19 single-family homes up to 36 feet in height along a scenic stretch of Mulholland Drive that currently contains oak woodlands.  Each home would include a two-car garage, and the site would also have 38 covered parking spaces for residents.
The City’s recent approval of the project drew a number of appeals from both individuals and groups, including the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority and the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy.  Appellants are concerned about a range of issues, including loss of protected trees and loss of habitat.  It’s also important to mention that the project site is designated by the City of LA as a very high fire severity zone.
The South Valley Area Planning Commission will be hearing appeals later this month.  Details below. 
South Valley Area Planning Commission
March 12, 2020, After 4:30 pm
Marvin Braude Constituent Service Center
6262 Van Nuys Blvd., 1st Floor Conference Room
Van Nuys, CA 91401

March 12, 2020 Hearing Notice

 If you can’t attend but would like to comment on the project, Comments can be sent to
Jivar Afshar, Planning Assistant

Be sure to include the case number in the subject line.
Case No. ZA-2007-1255-ZAD-1A and VTT-67505-1A
Construction of Metro's Crenshaw Light Rail Line was supposed to have been completed last year.  Then Metro said it would open in Spring of this year.  Now they've pushed the completion date back again, saying that work will be finished in Summer/Fall 2020.  If it was just this one project, the agency could be forgiven, but extended delays have become the norm for Metro.  The Regional Connector in Downtown was originally supposed to open this year, then it was 2021, and now Metro is projecting completion in 2022.  And in spite of last year's extended delays in finishing upgrades on the A Line (formerly the Blue Line), problems started occurring within days after the reopening.  On February 22 one of the cars actually went off the tracks. 
Taxpayers have spent billions of dollars because they were told they would get a better transit system.  And this is what we end up with?
Crenshaw Line Opening Could be Delayed

L.A. Metro’s Downtown Subway Project May Not Open Until Mid-2022

A-Line Train Derails in Downtown Long Beach

This month the Los Angeles Conservancy is offering walking tours that explore the linked histories of Union Station and Chinatown, while also highlighting the role women played in shaping those histories.  The tours take place on Thursday nights at 6:00 pm.  Click on the link for details.
A Woman's Place: Union Station and Chinatown


<![CDATA[UN4LA NEWS, FEBRUARY 2020]]>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 04:48:27 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/un4la-news-february-2020

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.

UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.

Contact UN4LA


On January 30, SB 50, Scott Wiener's controversial bill that would have upzoned urban areas around transit corridors, failed to win enough votes to move from the State Senate.  The bill's twisted passage to the Senate floor was highly unusual.  It was placed in suspense last year by the Appropriations Committee, then withdrawn from that committee on January 17 by Senate President Toni Atkins.  It was next sent to the Rules Committee, but was withdrawn again on January 27 and sent to the Senate floor for a vote.  A vote was held on Wednesday, January 29, in which the bill failed to win approval, but it came back again the following day.  By all accounts, Thursday was a long and difficult session for Senators, as the vote on SB 50 was delayed while Senator Wiener and his allies engaged in a furious lobbying effort to win support.  In the end, they couldn't come up with enough votes.

UN4LA agrees with tenants' rights activists and community groups across the State that SB 50 was a poorly conceived piece of legislation that would have done much more harm than good.  Recklessly upzoning parcels throughout the State would have pushed real estate prices higher than they are now, and would have likely resulted in massive displacement.  And Wiener's claim that upzoning near transit would get people out of cars and onto trains and busses is not supported by the data.  San Francisco, the area Wiener serves, has built thousands of new units near transit over the past two decades, and yet average weekday ridership in that city is below the level it was in 2001.  And while LA has been aggressively building residential high-rises along transit corridors, ridership is actually lower than it was 30 years ago, in spite of the fact that LA County has added more than a million people during that same period.  

But rational planning and actual data don't seem to mean much to Wiener, nor to Senate President Toni Atkins and Governor Gavin Newsom.  After the bill failed, all three pledged to keep pushing for legislation along the lines of SB 50.  This isn't surprising, since real estate investors, construction interests and chambers of commerce throughout California all support legislation that would force cities to upzone.  Opponents of SB 50 have also warned that Wiener may come back later this year with a gut-and-amend ploy, as he did in 2019.  Last year Wiener introduced SB 592, which initially addressed licensing requirements for cosmetologists.  In mid-year, Wiener threw out the original language and replaced it with new language that would have made changes to the Housing Accountability Act.  This cynical move seems to indicate that Wiener has little regard for transparency, and is more interested in getting bills passed than participating in an open democratic process.  

It's clear that SB 50's defeat does not mean the end of Sacramento's push to override local planning authority.  Scott Wiener will be back.      


Housing is obviously an issue of concern to everyone who lives in the City of LA, and residents should be aware that the City is getting reading to update the Housing Element of its General Plan.  This important process will affect how the City plans for future residential construction.  Follow the link below to view the current Housing Element, and to sign up for e-mail notifications regarding the update.

Housing Element


The public has a little over 3 weeks left to submit comments on the massive Sidewalk Repair Program Environmental Impact Report (SRP EIR), which runs over 1,700 pages including the appendices.  The City will claim that the 60 day comment period allows ample time to study the EIR, but it's important to remember that they released the EIR on December 26, in the middle of the holidays, when many Angelenos were out of town.  The City's interest in public participation in the process is questionable to begin with, since it began removing trees under the SRP almost two years ago.  

UN4LA will be joining other groups in asking for an extension of the EIR comment period, but even if that request is denied, we will still be submitting comments by the February 24 deadline.  You can submit comments, too.  To view the SRP EIR, click on the following link and scroll to the bottom of the page.

Sidewalk Repair Program EIR

The address to send comments to is:


The City asks that you include "SRP DEIR" in the subject line


In January the Board of Harbor Commissioners gave the greenlight for construction of the San Pedro Public Market to begin.  The first phase is comprised of 150,000 square feet of shops and restaurants and 30,000 square feet of office space.  The project includes the restoration of about 90,000 square feet of wharf and dock space.  An outdoor amphitheater is also planned, but approvals are still pending.  The San Pedro Public Market will replace Ports O' Call, a seaside plaza which was constructed in the early 60s.  This article from Curbed offers more details.

San Pedro Public Market Cleared to Start Construction


One of the most difficult issues facing the L.A. City Department of Recreation & Parks is handling traffic and tourism in Griffith Park.  Congestion heading up to the Observatory is getting steadily worse, and it's not uncommon to see a long line of cars parked on the roads leading up to it, since the parking lot is often full.  The problems surrounding the Hollywood Sign are even more vexing, with tourists racing up narrow hillside roads to snap a selfie with the landmark, often tossing bottles, cans, and cigarettes out of their cars on the way.  The cigarettes are especially problematic, since virtually the entire hillside area is a high fire hazard zone.

For years the City Council has been trying to find solutions to these problems, without much luck.  They've studied many options, including electric shuttles, improved signage, increased traffic enforcement, and changes to park hours.  And last year the City hired a firm to study the possibility of building an aerial tram through the park.  Supporters argue that it would give tourists a way to reach the sign without driving.  Detractors say that the construction of a tram would deface the park and possibly exacerbate tourism problems.

Study for Aerial Tram to Griffith Park Now Underway

On the other hand, maybe we could just create another Hollywood Sign.  

Report To Reduce Tourist Traffic Includes Second Hollywood Sign

<![CDATA[UN4LA NEWS, JANUARY 2020]]>Sat, 04 Jan 2020 01:22:25 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/un4la-news-january-2020

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.

UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.

Contact UN4LA


As 2020 begins, the State Legislature will return to its push for new laws to override local planning control.  Among the current proposals, the most controversial bill is Scott Wiener's SB 50.  Wiener claims that his bill is intended to solve the housing crisis, but there are many who argue that it would create more problems than it solves.  Among other things, SB 50 would:

  • create a streamlined approval process that would allow qualifying residential projects to be exempt from environmental review 
  • grant qualifying projects waivers on density limits
  • radically reduce local municipal control over residential development
  • allow pretty much anybody to sue a local jurisdiction for denying a multi-family project approval

Follow the link below to read the bill for yourself.

SB 50

This opinion piece from the San Francisco Examiner questions Wiener's commitment to providing real relief for low-income communities.

SB 50 Authors Need to Be Better Allies of Tenants


At long last, the City of LA has released the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for its Sidewalk Repair Program (SRP).  The environmental review process for this project has been convoluted even by LA standards.  It began in 2017, and the release of the DEIR only marks the beginning of public review of the document.  It will likely be many more months before it's approved.  While the City likes to claim that it values transparency, the fact that the DEIR was released on December 26, in he middle of the holidays, when many people are out of town, should serve as a reminder that City Hall generally prefers to discourage meaningful public participation.  And the fact that the EIR hasn't been approved yet has not stopped the City from forging ahead with the Program.  The Board of Public Works has been approving sidewalk repair projects for almost two years.

This is a problem because many projects approved under the SRP require the removal of trees, and LA's urban forest is already shrinking.  No one can argue that the City's sidewalks need to be improved, but it needs to be done in a responsible way.  The City estimates that implementation of the SRP would mean cutting down over 12,000 trees, which could have significant impacts on air quality and local temperatures.  The EIR claims that replacements would be planted at either a 2:1 or 3:1 ratio, but the City's record on the planting of replacement trees leaves a lot to be desired.  UN4LA has sued the City of LA because it has been removing trees for the SRP without having completed legally required environmental review.  The lower court decided in favor of the City, but we are currently pursuing an appeal.

To view the SRP EIR, click on the following link and scroll to the bottom of the page.

Sidewalk Repair Program EIR

You can also support the appeal requiring the City to complete the EIR before removing any more trees by clicking on the link below.

Support the Appeal


A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been released for a proposed project to be built at the intersection of De Soto and Burbank in Woodland Hills. The existing Warner Center Corporate Park would be demolished to make way for ten new buildings ranging from two stories to 24 stories high. The Project would be constructed in eight phases and includes about 1,000 multi-family units, including 841 apartments and 168 condos. The Project would also create over 1,000,000 square feet of office space, and about 60,000 square feet of restaurant and retail space, as well as a 228-room hotel.  You can view the MND by clicking on the link below.  Comments must be received by January 17.

De Soto/Burbank Master Plan Project Mitigated Negative Declaration


A Downtown artists' collective has filed a lawsuit against the developer that bought their building in 2018.  The Santa Fe Art Colony Tenants Association decided to sue the owner of the building, Fifteen Group, after being hit with rent increases that in some cases tripled what tenants were previously paying.  The units had been covered for decades by an agreement that restricted rent increases, but that agreement expired in 2016.  The Tenants Association had offered to purchase the building for $16.8 million, but Fifteen Group set the price at $22 million.  Part of the lawsuit is based on the tenants' claim that the developer did not negotiate with them in good faith.  This article from The Real Deal offers more details.  

Developer Sued by DTLA Artist Collective

<![CDATA[UN4LA NEWS, DECEMBER 2019]]>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 05:45:59 GMThttp://un4la.com/un4la-news/december-03rd-2019

A monthly newsletter published by United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles.

UN4LA's mission is to bring communities together to plan for a sustainable future.  Growth must be shaped by community engagement, not developer dollars.

Contact UN4LA


In November the South Los Angeles Area Planning Commission voted to uphold appeals asking the City to overturn the approval of a complex containing 577 apartments in South LA.  This may (or may not be) the final chapter in the project's long and difficult history.  Developer Charles Company initially received strong support from CD 10 Councilmember Herb Wesson.  It may be a coincidence that Charles Company co-founder Arman Gabay, his family members and associates, had contributed thousands of dollars to campaign and officeholder accounts associated with Wesson.  (Eric Garcetti and Jose Huizar have also received generous contributions from the developer and his associates.)  Wesson believed in the project so strongly that he helped the developer win millions of dollars in federal loans.  But the Councilmember seems to have had second thoughts about his association with Gabay after the developer was charged by the Department of Justice for having bribed a County official.  Wesson cited gentrification concerns in a letter of opposition submitted to the Commission.  Could there be other reasons the Councilmember wanted to make this project go away?

Officials Kill Plan for 577 Apartments in South LA


Just a few months back the Mayor and members of the LA City Council were patting themselves on the back for delivering a budget that included a large surplus.  Somehow that surplus has suddenly turned into a massive deficit.  How is this possible?  The LA Times breaks it down and asks if the budget process shouldn't be a whole lot more transparent.

What Do You Know, LA Is in Financial Peril Again


And speaking of transparency, was it really wise for the City of Inglewood to cover a deficit by diverting proceeds from a pension obligation bond into the City’s general fund, instead of using the money to pay down pension liabilities?  Inglewood took on $36 million in debt without voter approval, then its leadership pumped millions into pet projects and awarded raises to the City’s executives.  This story from The Mercury News lays out the details.

How Inglewood Sidestepped Voters When It Took On Millions in Debt to Cover Up a Deficit


Aids Healthcare Foundation (AHF) has filed a lawsuit over the City of LA’s denial of its application for funds to build affordable housing.  The non-profit had submitted a proposal to build over 200 units for seniors, LGBTQ persons and people suffering from chronic health issues at the corner of Seventh and San Julian in Downtown.  The City rejected the application saying it had already awarded available funds to other applicants, but AHF says the City’s process is unnecessarily complex and opaque.  City Controller Ron Galperin shares this view, and in a report released earlier this year his office highlighted the fact that even though City Hall has earmarked $1.2 billion for affordable and permanent supportive housing, no units have actually been completed.

AHF Sues City of LA over Skid Row Project Denial


Los Angeles County has $41 million that it wants to spend to assist low-income communities along the LA River, but deciding how to use the money could be a contentious process.  There are a number of issues confronting neighborhoods adjacent to the River, from gentrification to environmental contamination.  No doubt a number of communities will want a voice in deciding how to disburse the funds.

County Wants to Spend $41M Fighting Displacement along LA River


Illegal demolitions are far too common in LA, and the penalties for knocking a building down without proper permits are far too small.  Developers know that even if they get caught illegally bulldozing a building, the fines are minimal.  It's just a cost of doing business.  The Los Angeles Conservancy wants to change that.  Click on the link to learn more.

L.A. Needs Stronger Demolition Deterrents